Jamie Golombek: In virtually all instances, the taxpayer merely doesn’t meet the qualification standards or their proof strains credulity
Evaluations and proposals are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia could earn an affiliate fee from purchases made by way of hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
Taxpayers present up in federal courtroom virtually each week hoping to hold on to their COVID-19 advantages after being discovered ineligible by the Canada Income Company, however they’re often unsuccessful.
In virtually all instances, the taxpayer merely doesn’t meet the qualification standards or their proof strains credulity. Earlier than delving into the small print of a latest case, right here’s a fast refresher of the principles.
Commercial 2
Article content material
The Canada Emergency Response Profit (CERB) and its substitute, the Canada Restoration Profit (CRB), have been the 2 fundamental COVID-19 advantages accessible to people. The CERB was supplied for any four-week interval between March 15, 2020, and Oct. 3, 2020. To be eligible, an applicant needed to display they’d revenue of at the least $5,000 from (self-)employment revenue in 2019 or within the 12 months previous their first utility.
The CERB was changed by the CRB, which turned accessible for any two-week interval between Sept. 27, 2020, and Oct. 23, 2021, for eligible workers and self-employed employees who suffered a lack of revenue because of the pandemic.
CRB’s eligibility standards have been just like CERB in that they required, amongst different issues, that the person had earned at the least $5,000 in (self-)employment revenue in 2019, 2020 or in the course of the 12 months previous the date of their utility.
The CERB and CRB advantages are mostly chosen for evaluate by the CRA when it’s unclear if the taxpayer earned at the least $5,000 of revenue in a previous qualifying interval.
The most typical sorts of qualifying revenue are employment or self-employment (that’s, enterprise) revenue, however the CRA has accepted that non-eligible dividends (typically these paid out of company revenue taxed on the small enterprise fee) can depend in the direction of the minimal $5,000 in revenue required for eligibility since enterprise homeowners have flexibility in how they pay themselves (wage or dividends).
High Tales
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
It was the difficulty of dividends that turned an issue within the present case, which concerned a taxpayer who utilized for and obtained CERB advantages from March 15, 2020, to Sept. 26, 2020, and CRB advantages from Sept. 27, 2020, to the tip of October 2021.
The CRA concluded the taxpayer was not eligible for the advantages as a result of he didn’t earn at the least $5,000 from employment or self-employment for 2019, 2020, 2021 (as relevant), or in the course of the 12 months previous the date on which he submitted his purposes.
The taxpayer disagreed and finally took the matter to Federal Court docket, searching for a judicial evaluate of the CRA’s selections to disclaim him the advantages.
As with prior judicial evaluate instances, the function of the federal courtroom is to not conclude whether or not or not the taxpayer was really eligible for advantages, however moderately to find out, in mild of the proof and arguments that have been introduced to the CRA, whether or not the company’s determination to disclaim the advantages was “affordable.”
Within the years previous to evaluate, the taxpayer ran a specialised publishing enterprise, primarily geared toward professionals and contractors within the architectural area. Throughout the pandemic, a paper scarcity had a big affect on his means to print, and varied printing homes have been compelled to stop operations. He tried to transform his publication to a digital one to be able to mitigate the results, however his revenues plummeted.
Commercial 4
Article content material
Though his enterprise had by no means been worthwhile save for one 12 months prior to now, the taxpayer claimed to have obtained $7,000 in dividends from his firm in 2020. On a private degree, the taxpayer additionally by no means declared any private revenue apart from the $7,000 in dividends declared for 2020. This $7,000 in dividends got here underneath CRA scrutiny attributable to a sequence of financial institution transfers forwards and backwards between his registered retirement financial savings plan (RRSP), himself and his company.
The taxpayer testified that he withdrew $10,000 from his RRSP in December 2019 with the plan to switch it to his enterprise checking account to be able to “decrease his enterprise debt ratio … to make it eligible for a grant.”
Based on the financial institution statements he offered, he transferred $10,000 from his private checking account on Jan. 4, 2020, to his company’s account. On the identical day, the company then transferred the $10,000 again to him. Three days later, he wrote a cheque for a similar quantity to his brother.
The corporate’s accounting information confirmed that the switch of $10,000 was thought-about a cost of $3,000 to his spouse for “writing,” and the $7,000 to the taxpayer was labeled merely as “Withdrawals – House owners.”
Commercial 5
Article content material
In his 2020 revenue tax return, the taxpayer reported this $7,000 as dividend revenue, however didn’t file a T5 slip from the corporate displaying the dividend. The company didn’t produce a 2020 T5 slip till Sept. 12, 2023, following requests from the CRA and its concern that the 2020 “dividend” was “problematic.”
The choose stated that underneath Canada’s self-reporting tax system, the onus is on the taxpayer to supply ample proof to assist their utility for COVID-19 advantages, and the CRA is entitled to ask the taxpayer to supply extra paperwork or info to show their eligibility past a tax return.
That is supported by earlier jurisprudence, which has discovered that the CRA isn’t required to solely depend on a tax return, however may also contemplate the proof as a complete, which can embody invoices and buyer cost receipts, in addition to info accessible by way of the company’s inner information.
Primarily based on the sequence of transactions between the taxpayer’s private checking account and his enterprise account previous to the cost of the dividend, in addition to that the T5 slip was solely accomplished retroactively in September 2023 following a request from the CRA, the company felt the proof was “not sufficiently credible” to display that he had earned ample revenue to fulfill the revenue eligibility requirement.
Commercial 6
Article content material
Really useful from Editorial
The choose agreed, concluding that the CRA’s selections to disclaim the advantages have been “affordable and justified given all the proof on report.”
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
Should you appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.
Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information you have to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
Article content material
